Mistakes in adjudication
Series: Building Services Journal ; October 2000, 43(1)Publication details: 2000Subject(s):- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATION AWARDS
- MISTAKE
- BOUYGUES UK LTD V DAHL-JENSEN UK LTD
- BLOOR CONSTRUCTION V BOWMAN AND KIRKLAND
- JUDICIAL SYSTEM
- Dispute resolution
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS63006 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 108930-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Considers what action can be taken by those involved in an adjudication where the adjudicator makes a mistake. Looks at the case of "Bouygues v Dahl-Jensen" where the adjudicator miscalculated a payment. Also considers the possibility of correcting adjudication errors. Discusses "Bloor Construction (UK) v Bowman and Kirkland (London)", in which a judge decided that an adjudicator could correct certain mistakes. Concludes that, generally speaking, whether right or wrong an adjudicator's decision will be enforced by the courts.