| 000 | 00813cab a22002055a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L152785 | ||
| 008 | 110427e20110416xxk 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u152785 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aEdwards, Simon | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aThinking outside the box |
| 260 | _c2011 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1115) 16 April 2011, 87(1) |
||
| 520 | _aFollowing judgement in Jones v Kaney [2011] considers the consequences for expert witnesses. Argues that they now face a dilemma, what they would do if they changed their thoughts on one or more issues prior to or during a hearing. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aJONES V KANEY |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-EXPERT WITNESSES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c83091 _d83091 |
||