Image from Google Jackets

Darkness on the edge of town? Or is the calculation of consequential losses in dilapidation claims harder than it looks? (Part 1)

By: Language: English Series: Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation ; 4(3) Winter 2015-16, 130-142(13)Publication details: 2016Subject(s): Summary: A series of two articles looking at the calculation of consquential losses for breach of tenant's covenants in dilapidations claims. Part 1 looks at different ways of quantifying damages comparing contrasting rules in "Joyner v Weeks" [1891] 2 QB 31 and "Ruxley Electronics & Construction v Forsyth" [1996] AC 344. It also summarises the general law on causation, remoteness of damage and recovering the reasonable costs of mitigation. (Taken from abstract). (For Part 2 see L15219)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Journal article London Journals L159154 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 159154-1001

A series of two articles looking at the calculation of consquential losses for breach of tenant's covenants in dilapidations claims. Part 1 looks at different ways of quantifying damages comparing contrasting rules in "Joyner v Weeks" [1891] 2 QB 31 and "Ruxley Electronics & Construction v Forsyth" [1996] AC 344. It also summarises the general law on causation, remoteness of damage and recovering the reasonable costs of mitigation. (Taken from abstract). (For Part 2 see L15219)