Jones v Kaney [electronic resource]
Language: English Publication details: 2011Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2011] UKSC 13, 30 March 2011. Appellant J challenged the rule that an expert witness enjoyed immunity from any fom of civil action arising from evidence given in the course of proceedings. Considers whether public policy justifies granting immunity from liability in negligence to an expert witness in relation to the performance of his/her professional duties. Held: appeal allowed. Immunity from suit for breach of duty (whether in contract or in negligence) should be abolished.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 152587-2001 |
Browsing Virtual shelves, Shelving location: Online Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| ONLINE PUBLICATION Higher stamp duty thresholds would have doubled if linked to house prices | ONLINE PUBLICATION Construction output up by 1.8% in euro area | ONLINE PUBLICATION Affordable rents | ONLINE PUBLICATION Jones v Kaney | ONLINE PUBLICATION The value of registration | ONLINE PUBLICATION Linklaters Business Services v Sir Robert McAlpine Limited and Sir Robert McAlpine (Holdings) Limited and How Engineering Services Limited and How Group Limited and Southern Insulation (Medway) Limited | ONLINE PUBLICATION Soft-signalling |
[2011] UKSC 13, 30 March 2011. Appellant J challenged the rule that an expert witness enjoyed immunity from any fom of civil action arising from evidence given in the course of proceedings. Considers whether public policy justifies granting immunity from liability in negligence to an expert witness in relation to the performance of his/her professional duties. Held: appeal allowed. Immunity from suit for breach of duty (whether in contract or in negligence) should be abolished.