The green belt aspects of development control
Language: English Series: Journal of Planning and Environment Law ; (2), 146-160(15)Publication details: 2009Subject(s):- DONCASTER MBC V SOS ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS
- KENMAL MANOR MEMORIAL GARDENS LTD V FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE & ANOR
- PLANNING POLICY STATEMENT 7 (SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN RURAL AREAS)
- R (ON THE APPLICATION OF BASILDON DC) V FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE & TEMPLE
- R (ON THE APPLICATION OF CHELMSFORD BC) V FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE
- R (ON THE APPLICATION OF HEATH AND HAMPSTEAD SOCIETY) V VLACHOS & ANOR
- R (ON THE APPLICATION OF SAMUEL SMITH OLD BREWERY (TADCASTER)) V SELBY DC)
- TESCO STORES LTD V SOS ENVIRONMENT & ANOR
- WYCHAVON DISTRICT COUNCIL V SOS COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT & ORS
- BASILDON DC V SOS ENVIRONMENT
- BRENTWOOD BC V SOS ENVIRONMENT AND GRAY
- CHAPMAN V UNITED KINGDOM
- England and Wales -- 1543-
- ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT CONTROL
Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal article | London Journal article | L146612 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 146612-1001 |
Article discusses planning control in green belt areas and looks at planning policy guidance, the recent legislative history and planning decisions in very special circumstances. Explores and provides examples of the five sequential questions to be asked when determining whether or not a planning application should be granted. The author explores some reasons that may or may not constitute special circumstances and provides further examples of cases where they have been employed. Closes by saying that any possible list of 'special circumstances' is by nature endless and that judges have a duty to judge cases qualitatively and to apply value judgements.