In the event of tenant insolvency does the existing law of England and Wales achieve a fair balance between the interests of creditors and the interests of landlords? [electronic resource]
Language: English Publication details: [S.l.] PLA 2008Subject(s):- SEA ASSETS LTD V PERUSAHAAN PERSEROAN (PERSERO) PT PERUSAHAAN PENERBANGAN GARUDA INDONESIA
- PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD V POWERHOUSE LIMITED
- CRESFORT LTD V TESCO STORES LTD
- HEMINGWAY SECURITIES LTD V DUNRAVEN LTD
- LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925
- TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007
- LANDLORD AND TENANT (COVENANTS) ACT 1995 S17
- LAW OF DISTRESS AMENDMENT ACT 1908 S6
- INSOLVENCY ACT 1986
- INSOLVENCY RULES 1986
- United Kingdom --
- MANAGEMENT-CORPORATE RECOVERY
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 146477-2001 |
The Property Litigation Association essay competition 2008 winning entry. With reference to relevant case law discusses the law on tenant insolvency in England and Wales and considers the impact of administration, liquidation and Company Voluntary Arrangements on the interests of creditors and landlords. Concludes that whilst the law is not perfect, and does not create a balanced equilibrium, insolvency is not a perfect solution and inevitably most parties will be dissatisfied with the outcome.