Adjudicator's jurisdiction: a case of no contract, no dispute

By:

Franklin, K

Series: Architects' Journal ; 217(6) 13 February 2003, 40(1)Publication details: 2003Subject(s):

Summary: Considers "Carillion Construction v Devonport Royal Dockyard" (2002). Carillion (C) relied upon an oral agreement varying the terms of the written contract but, following the CA ruling that all the terms and not just the existence of a contract should be evident in writing in "RJT Consulting Engineering Ltd v DM Engineering (NI) Ltd" (CA X118297) (see also Abs66002, Abs65216, Abs65501and Abs64362), it was held that this did not form a contract in writing under Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 s107. It was also ruled that there was no dispute to refer to adjudication as C failed to provide the clarification of its claim requested by the defendant's management company.

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Date due	Barcode
Journal article	London Journal article	ABS66424 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available		121414-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	ABS66419 Rhondda Cynon Taff BC v Watkins	ABS66421 Eastern promise	ABS66423 The privileged few: practitioners and litigants must take ADR and the CPR into account before using without prejudice privilege, or face costs	ABS66424 Adjudicator's jurisdiction: a case of no contract, no dispute	ABS66425 Adjudicator's award given more clout	ABS66427 The hard hat and the gown	ABS66428 Energy efficient ventilation systems	Next

Considers "Carillion Construction v Devonport Royal Dockyard" (2002). Carillion (C) relied upon an oral agreement varying the terms of the written contract but, following the CA ruling that all the terms and not just the existence of a contract should be evident in writing in "RJT Consulting Engineering Ltd v DM Engineering (NI) Ltd" (CA X118297) (see also Abs66002, Abs65216, Abs65501and Abs64362), it was held that this did not form a contract in writing under Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 s107. It was also ruled that there was no dispute to refer to adjudication as C failed to provide the clarification of its claim requested by the defendant's management company.

Print
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)