As you were
Series: Building ; 267(8216) 11 January 2002, 63(1)Publication details: 2002Subject(s):- C & B SCENE CONCEPT DESIGN LTD V ISOBARS LTD
- VHE CONSTRUCTION PLC V RBSTB TRUST CO LTD
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATION AWARDS
- JURISDICTION
- Dispute resolution
Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal article | London Journal article | ABS65020 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 116652-1001 |
Argues that judges should approach adjudicators' decision with caution when these decisions are challenged in the Court of Appeal. Refers to two cases, "C&B Scene Concept Design v Isobars" and VHE v RBSTB" where challenges were made to the adjudicator's jurisdiction. The issue raised in these cases was the failure to serve notices. Suggests that there is an inconsistency between adjudicators as to what the consequences of such a failure are and that this needs to be clarified, hopefully by the C&B case.