Landlord and tenant - lease renewals
Series: Estates Gazette ; {2001} 48 EG 128 (CS) (1/12/01)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: "Burman v Mount Cook Land Ltd", CA 20 November 2001. Examines the right of a tenant to acquire a new lease under the provisions of the Leasehold Reform Housing and Development Act 1993. Tenant (B) appealed against a decision that a notice from landlord (M) refusing B's proposed premium was a valid counternotice. B appealed. Appeal allowed as the counternotice did not comply with s45(2)(b) of the 1993 Act and was therefore invalid.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London News article | WB3746-18 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 115892-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
"Burman v Mount Cook Land Ltd", CA 20 November 2001. Examines the right of a tenant to acquire a new lease under the provisions of the Leasehold Reform Housing and Development Act 1993. Tenant (B) appealed against a decision that a notice from landlord (M) refusing B's proposed premium was a valid counternotice. B appealed. Appeal allowed as the counternotice did not comply with s45(2)(b) of the 1993 Act and was therefore invalid.