National Car Parks Ltd v Trinity Development Co (Banbury) Ltd
Series: Estates Gazette Law Reports ; [2001] 28 EG 144-147(4)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: ChD 9 November 2000. By an agreement, which was called a licence, the appellant agreed with the respondent's predecessor in title, to manage a shoppers' car park. By the terms of the licence, the appellant was to pay a specified percentage of profits for the right. It was not intended to confer upon the licensee a right in the form of a tenancy. The agreement would also continue year upon year until determined by either party upon three months notice. On 4 May 2000 the respondent gave notice. The appellant contended that the notice was ineffective to determine the agreement because it granted a tenancy protected by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II. "Held", the agreement was a licence, but it did not grant the appellant a right ot keep out the grantor.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS64285 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 113917-1001 |
ChD 9 November 2000. By an agreement, which was called a licence, the appellant agreed with the respondent's predecessor in title, to manage a shoppers' car park. By the terms of the licence, the appellant was to pay a specified percentage of profits for the right. It was not intended to confer upon the licensee a right in the form of a tenancy. The agreement would also continue year upon year until determined by either party upon three months notice. On 4 May 2000 the respondent gave notice. The appellant contended that the notice was ineffective to determine the agreement because it granted a tenancy protected by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II. "Held", the agreement was a licence, but it did not grant the appellant a right ot keep out the grantor.