Where limits of control lie in arbitration
Series: Construction News ; (6704) February 2001, 14(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Construction contract disputes often involve a number of parties. Examines how subcontractors' rights in arbitration cases can be limited in multiparty disputes, because each of the contracts involving one of the parties, may not contain an arbitration clause. Illustrates difficulties that can arise in "Lafarge Redland Aggregates v Shepherd Hill Civil Engineering" in which it was eventually decided that the subcontractor could participate in a main contract arbitration with the consent of the employer and arbitrator. If there was no consensual agreement, the subcontractor could pursue the dispute under a separate arbitration.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS63563 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 111210-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Construction contract disputes often involve a number of parties. Examines how subcontractors' rights in arbitration cases can be limited in multiparty disputes, because each of the contracts involving one of the parties, may not contain an arbitration clause. Illustrates difficulties that can arise in "Lafarge Redland Aggregates v Shepherd Hill Civil Engineering" in which it was eventually decided that the subcontractor could participate in a main contract arbitration with the consent of the employer and arbitrator. If there was no consensual agreement, the subcontractor could pursue the dispute under a separate arbitration.