Fair rent
Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; [2000] EGCS 10 (2)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: "R v SoS Environment, Transport and the Regions and another, ex parte Spath Holme Ltd". CA 20 January 2000. The applicant landlord challenged the validity of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 which was made by the first respondent under a 'reserve power' contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s31. The applicant landlord claimed that the respondents had exceeded their power to legislate under the reserve power. "Held" The order was quashed.Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
News article | London News article | WB3606-19 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 104125-1001 |
"R v SoS Environment, Transport and the Regions and another, ex parte Spath Holme Ltd". CA 20 January 2000. The applicant landlord challenged the validity of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 which was made by the first respondent under a 'reserve power' contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s31. The applicant landlord claimed that the respondents had exceeded their power to legislate under the reserve power. "Held" The order was quashed.