Back to square one
Language: English Series: Construction News ; 6595 10 December 1998, 23(1)Publication details: 1998Subject(s): Summary: With the introduction of the Arbitration Act 1996, the need to refer specifically in a contract to an arbitration clause in another document was thought to have been removed. But the recent case "Trygg Hansa Insurance Co Ltd v Equitas Ltd" indicates that this may not be correct.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS59749 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 90321-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
With the introduction of the Arbitration Act 1996, the need to refer specifically in a contract to an arbitration clause in another document was thought to have been removed. But the recent case "Trygg Hansa Insurance Co Ltd v Equitas Ltd" indicates that this may not be correct.