The proof of excusable delay in building contracts without `as-built` records
Language: English Series: Construction Law Journal ; 13(4) 1997, 243-252(10)Publication details: 1997Subject(s):- ACCELERATION
- AS-BUILT RECORDS
- BUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
- COMPLETION
- CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMMES
- CONTRACT PROGRAMMES
- CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS
- DELAY
- DELAYS
- EXCUSABLE DELAY
- EXTENSION OF TIME
- JOHN BARKER CONSTRUCTION LTD V LONDON PORTMAN HOTEL LTD
- LOSS AND EXPENSE
- BUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS57236 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 79615-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Reviews the issues involved when considering a contractor`s proof of excusable delay in completion of the construction works, when `as-built` records are not available. Uses the recent case "John Barker Construction Ltd v London Portman Hotel Ltd" ([1996] 12 Const.L.J. 277) as an example. Includes criteria for maintaining `as-built` records.