Rural revivals
Language: English Series: Planning Week ; 4(32) 8 August 1996, 9(1)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: Outlines factors which need to be considered when dealing with planning applications to convert redundant agricultural buildings including actual existence of a building on the site "Hatfield v SoS Environment" 1996 and proof of redundancy "Orbit Developments (Southern) Ltd v SoS Environment and Windsor and Maidenhead RB" 1994 and "Bruce v SoS Environment and Havering LBC" 1994. The site of the building ie green belt (PPG2) or open countryside (PPG7) has to be considered.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS55731 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 18400-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Outlines factors which need to be considered when dealing with planning applications to convert redundant agricultural buildings including actual existence of a building on the site "Hatfield v SoS Environment" 1996 and proof of redundancy "Orbit Developments (Southern) Ltd v SoS Environment and Windsor and Maidenhead RB" 1994 and "Bruce v SoS Environment and Havering LBC" 1994. The site of the building ie green belt (PPG2) or open countryside (PPG7) has to be considered.